Telos Labs
Strategic Assessment · 3 weeks, one written call

Build, buy, or kill.
Decided in three weeks.

A 3-week decision process that shows what each option will actually cost, with real vendor pricing and gives you a buildable plan if building wins. Before you commit $500K–$5M to the wrong path.

Strategic decision being routed to a clear build, buy, or kill outcome
Who this is for

You're responsible for critical technology decisions, without a clear framework to make them.

You have tools, workflows, and platforms that work. They just don't work together.

AI is now on the roadmap. Every decision carries more weight.

Fragmented Foundations

Built at different times, by different teams. They operate in isolation, not as a unified whole.

Compounding Complexity

Every fix adds more complexity. The stack gets harder to understand, not easier.

Decision Gridlock

Too many options. No clear way to choose. Rebuild, buy, or extend all feel risky.

The challenge isn't options. It's knowing what's right.

That's what the Strategic Assessment solves.
One of these is sitting on your desk

The four stuck places we keep finding.

These aren't edge cases. They're where most mid-size teams lose another quarter.

01

Build vs. buy, undecided for 9 months.

Every vendor pitch looks plausible. Every internal proposal looks expensive. Nobody can make the call stick.

02

Your CRM (Salesforce) bill keeps climbing, and no one can explain why.

You're being told to "consolidate" or "rebuild." Both are expensive. No one can tell you which is actually right.

03

An AI roadmap that's 80% demos.

You've seen the chatbot. You've seen the copilot. None of it has changed how your team actually works.

04

A CTO who needs judgment, not hands.

You don't need another contractor. You need someone who's shipped this before and will tell you the truth.

What you walk away with

Not a deck. A decision.

Everything you need to commit with confidence or walk away with clarity.

01

The 3–4 real options you have, and which one actually makes sense

Build, migrate, or consolidate. Each path includes real vendor pricing and what it will actually cost over time.

02

What each vendor will actually cost and the risks

Feature gaps. Lock-in risks. Not a generic comparison.

03

The hidden costs everyone misses

Migration effort, retraining, integration rebuild, and internal disruption, quantified before you commit.

04

A build-ready plan (if building is the right move)

So you can execute — or take it to another team — with clarity and leverage.

How it works

From kickoff to decision in 3 weeks.

Three focused weeks. One written plan your team can act on.

Week 1

Listen

Interviews with your operators, CTO, and two customers. We read your contracts, your stack, and your last three board decks. No workshops.

Week 2

Model

We model build vs. buy vs. consolidate using real pricing. You see the real options take shape and react to actual scenarios, not broad assumptions.

Week 3

Decide

A written recommendation. Build, buy, or kill, with owners, costs, and a 90-day execution path. We stay on to help you start.

Real examples

Not decks. Real decisions.
Delivered in three weeks.

Every assessment ends with a written call, and the first two weeks of work already scoped.

Services firm · CRM consolidation
Avoided $1.5M/year in unnecessary Salesforce costs.

The client was being pushed toward Salesforce consolidation. Our analysis showed it would actually increase cost.

We identified a lower-cost build path with equivalent functionality and gave them the plan to execute it.

Decision made in three weeks. Saved $1.5M/year.

Growth-stage agency · AI roadmap
Shipped, not demoed.

A growth-stage agency with a 14-month internal build and three pilots that never made it out of staging.

We retired what wasn't working, picked the one workflow that compounds, and scoped the first two weeks of real work.

The roadmap became a list of changes that ship.

Why Telos, not them?

There is no strategy deck for how your business actually runs.

Dev shops

They start building before knowing if they should.

No vendor analysis. No cost modeling. You end up committing before understanding the decision.

Strategy consultants

You get slides. Not a decision.

Months of analysis, a 60-page report, and no one who can actually build the thing they recommended.

Telos

We give you the decision and the plan to execute it.

Three weeks. Real vendor pricing. A written recommendation with owners, costs, and a 90-day path. We stay on to help you start.

Investment

Three weeks. One decision.

Typically prevents a $500K–$2M mistake.

If this prevents one wrong vendor decision, it pays for itself immediately.

FAQ

Questions we hear before every engagement.

Because you've been trying. If your team could resolve this in a meeting, you would have done it six months ago. Internal teams are too close to the politics and too invested in existing tools to make an objective call. We bring real vendor pricing, outside pattern-matching, and zero attachment to what you already own.
Good. We'll pressure-test it. If your preferred vendor is the right call, we'll confirm it and give you leverage for the negotiation. If it's not, you'll know before you sign a multi-year contract. Either way, you'll have the numbers to defend the decision to your board.
Consultants give you a report. We give you a decision. Our deliverable isn't a deck you present. It's a written recommendation with real costs, named owners, and a 90-day execution plan. And we've actually built the things we're recommending. That changes the advice.

Facing a $500K+ decision? Tell us what's on your desk.

We'll tell you if this is worth doing — or if you can stay the course. No pitch. No commitment.